Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s re-entry into the Arab League after a 12-year suspension has sparked widespread debate and speculation. His recent speech at the Arab League summit in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, underscored Syria’s enduring ties to the Arab world. At the same time, he warned against interference in Syria’s internal affairs. With significant implications for regional dynamics, Assad’s return marks a critical turning point in the Middle East.
Assad’s resilience and shifting regional alliances
Assad’s reinstatement to the Arab League is seen by many as a clear indication of his apparent victory in the Syrian civil war. In particular, Saudi Arabia, which previously supported anti-Assad militias, is now reorienting its Middle East policy and repairing relations with the Syrian leader. The warm welcome that Assad received from Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman represents a remarkable shift in regional alliances. The decision to readmit Assad without preconditions is a reflection of the perceived strategic dividends of his resilience and unwavering determination throughout the conflict.
In order to fully understand the historical significance of Assad’s return to the Arab League, it is necessary to examine the dynamics that have shaped the region over the past decade. The Arab Spring, which began in 2010, ushered in a period of tumultuous change and political upheaval in several Middle Eastern countries, including Syria. The uprisings, fueled by demands for democratic reform, social justice, and economic opportunity, sparked intense power struggles and violent conflict.
The Syrian civil war, which has become one of the most protracted and devastating conflicts of the Arab Spring, has seen a complex web of regional and international actors intervene in support of different factions. Assad’s ability to withstand this pressure and remain in power demonstrates the resilience of his regime and underscores the shifting alliances in the region.
Internal divisions and Qatar’s discontent
Although Assad’s return has been hailed as a turning point, there are still internal divisions within the Arab League. Qatar, for example, demonstrated its dissatisfaction by abstaining from speaking at the summit. This highlights the challenges the Arab League faces in promoting unity and coherence among member states with diverse regional interests.
Historically, the Arab League has been plagued by internal divisions that reflect the diverse interests, priorities, and ideologies of its member states. The League’s establishment in 1945 marked an important milestone in Arab unity to address common challenges and advance common goals. Over the years, however, divergent political orientations, conflicting national interests, and power struggles have hampered the League’s effectiveness in achieving collective action.
The Arab-Israeli conflict, a longstanding and divisive issue in the region, has often strained the unity of the Arab League. Disagreements over approaches to peace negotiations, the status of al-Quds/Jerusalem, and the rights of Palestinian refugees have often created rifts within the League. These historical divisions have carried over into discussions about Assad’s return, with some member states expressing reservations and emphasizing the need for greater accountability.
Goals of the Arab League Reconciliation
Syria’s reintegration into the Arab League is driven by several key objectives. These include the repatriation of Syrian refugees, the curbing of captagon trade, and the restoration of power and stability within the country. Refugee repatriation is a priority for economic stability, as the displacement of millions of Syrians has strained the resources of host countries. In addition, the Arab League seeks to combat the lucrative Captagon trade, which provides significant revenue to the Assad regime. The restoration of power in Syria and an end to the civil war are also key goals, with implicit demands for the withdrawal of the Free Syrian Army and the Syrian Democratic Forces, both of which have the support of Türkiye and the United States.
The complexities of the Syrian civil war
To understand the context of these goals, it is crucial to delve into the complexities of the Syrian civil war. The conflict erupted in 2011, when peaceful protests calling for political reform and ending governmental corruption were met with a harsh crackdown by the Assad regime. The ensuing violence fragmented the opposition and spawned various armed groups seeking to overthrow Assad.
With regional and international powers backing different factions, the conflict quickly became a multifaceted proxy war. Türkiye, for example, supported rebel groups and provided them with sanctuary, while also advocating for Assad’s removal from power. The United States, along with its allies, supported the anti-Assad forces, viewing his regime as a threat to regional stability.
In contrast, countries such as Russia and Iran staunchly supported the Assad regime. They saw it as a key ally in the region and a bulwark against what they perceived as Western interventionism. Russia’s military intervention in 2015 turned the tide of the war in Assad’s favor, allowing him to regain control of significant territory.
As the conflict enters its second decade, the scale of human suffering and displacement has reached staggering proportions. Millions of Syrians have been internally displaced or forced to seek refuge in neighboring countries and beyond. The burden on host countries, particularly Jordan, Lebanon and Türkiye, has been immense. The economic, social and political consequences have been devastating.
Repatriating Syrian refugees: A pressing concern
Repatriating Syrian refugees has become a pressing concern, not only for humanitarian reasons, but also for regional stability and economic recovery. The burden of hosting refugees has exacerbated social tensions and strained public services, while straining the resources and infrastructure of neighboring countries. The Arab League’s push for repatriation reflects a shared understanding that addressing the refugee crisis is essential to regional stability and to the wellbeing of both displaced Syrians and the receiving countries.
The Captagon trade and its implications
Another important goal behind Assad’s reinstatement is the need to curb the Captagon trade. Captagon, a highly addictive amphetamine-type stimulant, has been a lucrative source of revenue for the Assad regime. The production and trafficking of this illegal drug has flourished in the chaos of the civil war, providing financial support for the regime and fueling further instability.
The Arab League’s inclusion of combating the trade in Captagon as an objective underscores the recognition that addressing this issue is critical to undermining a key source of support for the Assad regime. It also dovetails with international efforts to combat drug trafficking and organized crime, as the Captagon trade extends beyond Syria’s borders and infiltrates regional and global markets.
Reestablishing power and stability in Syria
Restoring power and stability in Syria is an ambitious but critical goal for the Arab League. The protracted conflict has left the country fragmented, with competing centers of power, weakened institutions, and a devastated economy. Rebuilding Syria will require not only physical reconstruction, but also political reconciliation and the establishment of a functioning governance structure.
The road to achieving these goals is challenging. Syria’s civil war has been a flashpoint for deep sectarian divisions, regional rivalries, and conflicting geopolitical interests. The prospects for a peaceful resolution have been complicated by the involvement of external actors with their own agendas. The complex interplay between Türkiye, Russia, and regional alliances adds another layer of complexity to the situation.
Regional Powers’ Role
Türkiye’s role in the conflict adds another layer of complexity. Assad’s accusation that Türkiye is pursuing an expansionist agenda reminiscent of the Ottoman Empire reflects the strained relationship between the two countries. Türkiye has been a major supporter of opposition forces in Syria, including the Free Syrian Army and the Syrian Democratic Forces. It is likely that Türkiye’s involvement in the conflict and its support for these groups played a role in the initial suspension of Syria’s membership in the Arab League. In order to protect its national interests and prevent the further strengthening of Kurdish forces along its border, Türkiye has pursued a multifaceted approach that includes military intervention, the establishment of safe zones, and the provision of humanitarian aid to Syrians.
Syria’s reinstatement to the Arab League also raises questions about the future of regional alliances and power dynamics. Saudi Arabia’s policy shift and willingness to mend fences with Assad demonstrates the evolving nature of alliances in the Middle East. It suggests a recalibration of priorities and a desire for stability in the region. Even if that means engaging with a leader who has been internationally isolated.
Saudi Arabia’s historical rivalry with Iran has been a major factor in the shaping of its stance on the Syrian conflict. Iran, along with Russia, has been a staunch supporter of the Assad regime and views its survival as crucial to maintaining its influence in the region. This alignment has created a regional power struggle between Saudi Arabia and Iran, with Syria becoming a battleground for their competing interests.
Furthermore, the recent resumption of diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran, facilitated by China, adds a new layer of complexity to the regional dynamics surrounding the Syrian conflict. While their historical rivalry has fueled tensions and proxy conflicts throughout the Middle East, this diplomatic breakthrough signals a potential shift in their approach to regional disputes. However, the true extent of this reconciliation and its implications for their respective positions on the Syrian conflict remain uncertain.
Geopolitical landscape of the Middle East
Moreover, the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East has undergone significant changes in recent years. The United States, once a key player in the region, has scaled back its involvement, adopting a more limited approach and focusing on counterterrorism. This withdrawal, coupled with the growing influence of Russia and Iran, has changed the dynamics and created space for regional actors to assert their interests.
In this context, Russia’s role in the Middle East is becoming increasingly important. Putin’s message of support and the perception of Russia as a stabilizing factor in Syria are consistent with its ongoing military involvement and support for the Assad regime. Russia’s interests in the region extend beyond Syria, as evidenced by its growing multilateral cooperation with Arab countries. Converging interests between Russia and some Arab League members could potentially reshape regional dynamics and influence future developments.
Conclusion
Nevertheless, Assad’s return to the Arab League is not without controversy. Critics argue that accepting Assad without preconditions sends a troubling message. It could undermine efforts to hold him accountable for the use of chemical weapons and human rights abuses during the civil war. The international community must remain vigilant and ensure that the pursuit of stability and dialogue is consistent with the principles of justice, accountability and respect for human rights.
The Syrian conflict has resulted in widespread human rights violations, including indiscriminate bombings, enforced disappearances, and the use of chemical weapons against civilians. Responsibility for these atrocities lies not only with the Assad regime, but also with other parties to the conflict. Holding all parties accountable for their actions is critical to achieving justice and preventing impunity.
The situation is further complicated by the complex dynamics involving Türkiye, Russia, and regional alliances. Balancing competing interests, addressing historical animosities, and promoting genuine reconciliation will require diplomatic finesse and a comprehensive approach. To ensure a sustainable solution to the Syrian crisis, it is imperative that the Arab League navigate these challenges with a commitment to human rights, inclusiveness, and long-term stability.
Looking ahead, important considerations for resolving the Syrian crisis arise from the Arab League’s acceptance of Assad. While repatriating refugees, curbing the Captagon trade, and restoring stability in Syria are critical goals, it is important to ensure that Assad’s return does not lead to a continuation of violence or a disregard for human rights. The international community must remain committed to holding all parties to the conflict accountable for their actions, and must continue to seek a comprehensive and inclusive approach in order to achieve a sustainable solution.
In conclusion, the return of Bashar al-Assad to the Arab League marks a controversial watershed moment in the Middle East, with significant implications for the dynamics of the region. Assad’s reinstatement reflects shifting alliances, the resilience of his regime, and recognition of the need for stability in the region. However, internal divisions within the Arab League and concerns about accountability and human rights remain. The goals of repatriating Syrian refugees, curbing the captagon trade, and restoring power and stability in Syria are essential, but achieving them will require navigating complex geopolitical interests and historical tensions. The future of regional alliances, the role of external actors, and the pursuit of justice and accountability remain critical considerations in resolving the Syrian crisis. The international community must remain vigilant to ensure that the pursuit of stability is consistent with the principles of justice, human rights, and long-term peace. Only through comprehensive and inclusive efforts can a sustainable solution be achieved, bringing an end to the devastating Syrian conflict and fostering a more stable Middle East.
All publishing rights and copyrights reserved to MENA Research and Study Center.
